Tags

Applications of clethodim were found to strongly influence the growth and development of canola, ultimately impacting on grain yields and quality. The rate and timing of applications had a large impact on the severity of damage and yield losses to canola.

BACKGROUND

Clethodim has become an important herbicide in the control of annual ryegrass in southern Australia. In recent times, label rate changes have occurred to enable higher rates of up to 0.5L/ha to be used for increased levels of weed control in canola, pulses and pasture legumes. Since the use of this higher rate, a number of crop effects have been reported in canola. This includes delayed flowering, distorted flower buds and reduced grain yields. Factors that influence crop effects include herbicide rate, crop stress at herbicide application, timing of application and varietal differences in tolerance.

Given the widespread importance of the use of clethodim in the farming rotation and increased application rates, this project was established.

Start:

July 1, 2013

Finish:

June 30, 2015

Project participants

SARDI: Michael Zerner and Rob Wheeler.

The problem

Increased application rates of clethodim have created concern due to crop damage in canola. In addition, the timing of application has been shown to have an impact on yield and oil content.

The research

This research has shown that clethodim can severely impact the growth, development and grain yield of canola. These effects are amplified with increasing herbicide rates and applications at later canola growth stages. Not all canola varieties are affected to the same degree.

More information

Michael Zerner
University of Adelaide (previously at SARDI)
08 8313 6738
[email protected]

Research aims

The primary aim of the project was to quantify the effects of increased application rates of clethodim on growth, development and yield of canola.

The research was designed to lead to a better understanding of clethodim tolerance in canola by determining the degree of grain yield losses occurring from its use. It was also designed to identify any varieties which show increased tolerance to assist in maximising farm productivity and profitability.

In the field

Field trials were conducted at three sites in 2013 and 2014 at Roseworthy, Yeelanna and Hart.

Clethodim treatments used at trials at Hart and Yeelanna were:

  • Untreated control
  • 0.5L/ha applied at 4-leaf growth stage
  • 1L/ha applied at 4-leaf growth stage
  • 0.5L/ha applied at 8-leaf growth stage
  • 1L/ha applied at 8-leaf growth stage
  • 0.25L/ha applied at 4-leaf and 8-leaf growth stages (0.5L/ha in total)
  • 0.5L/ha applied at 4-leaf and 8-leaf growth stages (1L/ha in total)
  • 0.5L/ha applied at bud initiation
  • 1L/ha applied at bud initiation

*Application of clethodim at 1L/ha is not a registered rate and was undertaken for experimental purposes.

Variety tolerance trials were conducted at Roseworthy. A range of conventional, Clearfield and Triazine-tolerant varieties were tested.

Results

Early applications at 4-leaf growth stage of up to 1L/ha were relatively safe as no significant yield reductions occurred in both seasons at Hart and Yeelanna. When applied at the 8-leaf growth stage, the 0.5L/ha rate caused no significant yield loss, but the 1L/ha rate caused yield reductions. Depending on the variety, yield was reduced by up to 13% at Hart and up to 25% at Yeelanna. When clethodim was applied later again, at bud initiation, grain yields were reduced with up to 20% yield losses at 0.5L/ha and 40% at 1L/ha at Hart, and 30% at 0.5L/ha and 52% at 1L/ha at Yeelanna.

It is evident that later application timings of clethodim significantly increase the risk of yield reductions and these losses can be severe. Splitting the applied rates over two applications improved the level of safety compared to one application at the 8-leaf stage.

From a visual damage perspective, a number of symptoms were observed. These included leaf colour changes, flower distortion and pod distortion. Chlorophyll/greenness readings were strongly affected by clethodim applications. Despite this, clethodim had no impact on biomass production, plant height or maturity.

Of the three varieties used in field trials – AV Garnet, ATR Gem and Hyola 474 CL – AV Garnet was more tolerant of clethodim. In the varietal tolerance trial at Roseworthy, there was a large range of variation in tolerance between varieties. There was no improved tolerance in either of the conventional, Clearfield or TT variety groups, with individual varieties in each showing different tolerances. Variety selection will have a large influence on the yield losses that can occur if using clethodim at excessive rates or timings prone to causing damage.

Grain quality was also severely affected by clethodim applications. Oil content was significantly reduced as rates of clethodim increased.

Value for growers

Canola is sensitive to increased application rates of clethodim and sensitivity is also influenced by variety and growth stage at application. When requiring high rates of clethodim, applications at early growth stages of canola are best to avoid crop damage and minimise potential yield losses. Variety selection also influences the level of crop damage with some varieties more tolerant than others.

Key findings in this project have been:

  • Clethodim rates exceeding 0.5L/ha significantly increase the risk of losses to grain yield in canola
  • Applications at early growth stages of canola appear the best to avoid crop damage
  • Variation does exist between varieties across all crop types in their level of sensitivity
  • Visual damage symptoms were observed with flower distortion the most distinguishable